Synopsis: Jane and Aries are teenage parents. They make a living out of stealing on the streets… until fate hits back at them. (Cinemalaya)
When I read all the synopses for this year’s Cinemalaya, Pamilya Ordinaryo piqued my interest the most. Granted that it is still about poverty, a topic used and overused by filmmakers, the story about teenage parents living on the streets somehow intrigued me.
I watched the film at Greenbelt 1 and a minute before the film started, the Production Manager spoke and said that the film was 5 minutes off-sync and the case was the same for their screenings in other venues as well. The good thing was the off-sync was not during a crucial scene. That would’ve sucked if ever.
I loved the lead actors for the most part. There are times when you can see that they are snapping out of their characters, but I am thoroughly impressed and convinced by their performances.
The movie is heart-wrenching, and while it does not in any way try to justify the acts of the lead characters, it somehow provides a glimpse into the motivations for their actions. You cannot help but pity the characters and be frustrated with their situation, and with the people who keep on taking advantage of their situation.
I just felt like the movie ends so abruptly, without any resolution. It can be intentional to invoke the message that there is no end in sight in the hardships of the characters, but I felt like it could’ve used a few more minutes to at least let that idea linger and marinate in the minds of the viewers.
I also want to get the attention of the people behind the film. It really bothered me that the subtitles kept using the word “fag” to refer to “bakla.” I understand brevity and all, but “gay guy/man” will not fill up the whole screen. It just gives the impression that it is okay to use “fag” to refer to gay men. It is not. It never will be.